Correction to: Mapping Welfare State Development in (post) Neoliberal Latin America (Social Indicators Research, (2021), 10.1007/s11205-020-02575-6)

dc.contributor.author	Cruz‑Martínez, Gibrán
dc.date.accessioned	2021-06-08T04:46:22Z
dc.date.available	2021-06-08T04:46:22Z
dc.date.issued	2021
dc.identifier	10.1007/s11205-021-02669-9
dc.identifier.issn	03038300
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/8917
dc.description.abstract	In the original publication of this article, the interpretation of one of the results derived from the csQCA is incorrect. The correct interpretation provided in this correction. Uruguay, Chile, Argentina, Brazil and Costa Rica show, in Table 5, a combined presence of comparatively high-revenue capabilities and a high degree of democratic strength. These two are necessary conditions, but not a sufficient condition, for a medium or high welfare state development outcome. Panama experienced the same combination of conditions but ended up with a WeSDI score of 0.5895—i.e. low welfare state development.	es_ES
dc.language.iso	en	es_ES
dc.publisher	Springer Science and Business Media B.V.	es_ES
dc.title	Correction to: Mapping Welfare State Development in (post) Neoliberal Latin America (Social Indicators Research, (2021), 10.1007/s11205-020-02575-6)	es_ES
dc.type	Article	es_ES

Repositorio Académico