Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCruz‑Martínez, Gibrán
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T04:46:22Z
dc.date.available2021-06-08T04:46:22Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier10.1007/s11205-021-02669-9
dc.identifier.issn03038300
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/8917
dc.description.abstractIn the original publication of this article, the interpretation of one of the results derived from the csQCA is incorrect. The correct interpretation provided in this correction. Uruguay, Chile, Argentina, Brazil and Costa Rica show, in Table 5, a combined presence of comparatively high-revenue capabilities and a high degree of democratic strength. These two are necessary conditions, but not a sufficient condition, for a medium or high welfare state development outcome. Panama experienced the same combination of conditions but ended up with a WeSDI score of 0.5895—i.e. low welfare state development.es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media B.V.es_ES
dc.titleCorrection to: Mapping Welfare State Development in (post) Neoliberal Latin America (Social Indicators Research, (2021), 10.1007/s11205-020-02575-6)es_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record