Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBermejo-Cantarero, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez-Bueno, Celia
dc.contributor.authorMartinez Vizcaino, Vicente J.
dc.contributor.authorRedondo-Tébar, Andrés
dc.contributor.authorPozuelo-Carrascosa, Diana Patricia
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-López, Mairena
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-05T03:34:30Z
dc.date.available2021-05-05T03:34:30Z
dc.date.issued2021-12
dc.identifier10.1186/s12955-021-01766-0
dc.identifier.issn14777525
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/8828
dc.description.abstractBackground: No review to date has evaluated the association between physical fitness and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in healthy children and adolescents. The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to examine the relationship between both cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and muscular fitness (MF) and HRQoL in healthy subjects under 18 years of age and to describe the dimensions of HRQoL in which these relationships are more robust. Methods: The Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, SCIELO, SPORTDiscus and PEDro databases were systematically searched to collect observational studies that examined the relationship between CRF and HRQoL and between MF and HRQoL in participants under 18 years of age without any diagnosed medical condition. Pooled effect sizes (ES) were estimated for the associations between both CRF and MF and the various HRQoL dimensions. Results: The pooled ES (95% CI) estimates for the relationship between CRF and HRQoL were as follows: 0.19 (0.10 to 0.27) for physical well-being, 0.19 (0.07 to 0.32) for psychological well-being, 0.20 (− 0.14 to 0.55) for perceived health status, 0.10 (0.00 to 0.20) for self-perception/self-esteem, 0.07 (− 0.05 to 0.19) for quality of family relationship, 0.14 (0.04 to 0.25) for quality of peer relationship, 0.17 (0.04 to 0.29) for everyday functioning at school and 0.20 (0.12 to 0.28) for total HRQoL score. The pooled ES (95% CI) estimates for the relationship between MF and HRQoL were: 0.25 (0.12 to 0.37) for physical well-being, 0.11 (0.04 to 0.17) for psychological well-being, 0.08 (0.01 to 0.15) for quality of family relationship, 0.14 (0.03 to 0.25) for quality of peer relationship, and 0.09 (0.03 to 0.14) for total HRQoL score. Conclusions: Our data suggest that both CRF and MF are positively associated with HRQoL, mainly in physical, psychological and peer relationships. Moreover, CRF is positively associated with school dimensions and MF is positively associated with family relationships. Trail registration Protocol PROSPERO registration number: CRD42015025823.es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltdes_ES
dc.subjectAdolescentses_ES
dc.subjectChildrenes_ES
dc.subjectHealth-related quality of lifees_ES
dc.subjectHRQoLes_ES
dc.subjectMeta-analysises_ES
dc.subjectPhysical fitnesses_ES
dc.subjectPhysical well-beinges_ES
dc.subjectPsychological well-beinges_ES
dc.subjectStrengthes_ES
dc.titleRelationship between both cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness and health-related quality of life in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studieses_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record