Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBedecarratz Scholz, Francisco Javier
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-24T16:27:33Z
dc.date.available2021-02-24T16:27:33Z
dc.date.issued2020-12
dc.identifier10.4067/S0718-33992020000200694
dc.identifier.issn07183399
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/8629
dc.description.abstractThis paper provides a critical analysis of the traditional perception of the organisational fault as a rule of attribution in the criminal liability of corporations. In the following pages, the author sustains that the obligations of direction and supervision stipulated in the law are equivalent to organisational rules of behaviour of non-criminal nature. This thesis is based on a doctrinal analysis, on a study of Act No. 20.393, of precedents and of comparative law, that fundament the nature and content of these obligations. Finally, the article proposes a categorization of the obligations and states the fundamental criteria for its future specification.es_ES
dc.language.isoeses_ES
dc.publisherCentro Estudios Derecho Penales_ES
dc.subjectCompliancees_ES
dc.subjectCorporate governancees_ES
dc.subjectCriminal liabilityes_ES
dc.subjectOrganisational faultes_ES
dc.subjectRules of behavioures_ES
dc.titleOrganisational fault and behavioural rules in the indicting of legal personses_ES
dc.title.alternativeDefecto de organización y reglas de comportamiento en la imputación de las personas jurídicases_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record