Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJiménez-Castillo M.A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-02T22:21:17Z
dc.date.available2020-09-02T22:21:17Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citation4, 1, 56-72
dc.identifier.issn22542035
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/5059
dc.descriptionThroughout this article we will discuss some epistemological limitations that the main contemporary theories of development face. We will examine how despite such theories bases their assumptions from an individual perspective, development literature has traditionally tend to move away to complexity by a theoretical assimilation of personal utility's maximalization proposition. Such was possible since Kant's note a transgression of becoming ends into means of development. This perspective particularly assumed by human development theory is replaced by an epistemological reductionism based on individual and social justice as conceptual abstractions.
dc.language.isoes
dc.publisherUniversidad de Zaragoza
dc.subjectConsequentialism
dc.subjectDeterminist
dc.subjectPareto optimal
dc.subjectUniversalism
dc.titleA (meta) critique to contemporary development schools [Una (meta) crítica a las escuelas contemporáneas de desarrollo]
dc.typeArticle


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record