Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBersezio C.
dc.contributor.authorMartín J.
dc.contributor.authorMayer C.
dc.contributor.authorRivera O.
dc.contributor.authorEstay J.
dc.contributor.authorVernal R.
dc.contributor.authorHaidar Z.S.
dc.contributor.authorAngel P.
dc.contributor.authorOliveira O.B.
dc.contributor.authorJr.
dc.contributor.authorFernández E.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-02T22:13:09Z
dc.date.available2020-09-02T22:13:09Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier10.1007/s11136-018-1972-7
dc.identifier.citation27, 12, 3199-3207
dc.identifier.issn09629343
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/3751
dc.descriptionPurpose: Intracoronary bleaching is a minimally invasive, alternative treatment that addresses aesthetic concerns related to non-vital teeth discoloration. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have assessed the psychosocial impacts of such procedures on patients’ aesthetic perceptions. The aim of this study was to evaluate aesthetic perceptions and the psychosocial impact of patients up to 3 months after their teeth had been bleached with hydrogen peroxide (35%) and carbamide peroxide (37%) using the walking bleach technique. Methods: The patients were randomly divided into two groups according to the bleaching agent used: G1 = hydrogen peroxide 35% (n = 25) and G2 = carbamide peroxide 37% (n = 25). Non-vital bleaching was performed in four sessions. Color was objectively (ΔE) and subjectively (ΔSGU) evaluated. Aesthetic perception and psychosocial factors were evaluated before, 1 week and 1 month after the bleaching using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) and Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ) questionnaires. Results: The color change (ΔE) values at 1 month were G1 = 16.80 ± 6.07 and G2 = 14.09 ± 4.83. These values remained stable until the third month after treatment (p > 0.05). There was a decrease in the values of OHIP-aesthetics and PIDAQ after treatment versus baseline (p < 0.05). This status was maintained through the third month after treatment. Conclusions: Both agents were highly effective and had a positive impact on the aesthetic perception and psychosocial impact of patients, values that also remained stable over time. Non-vital bleaching yields positive and stable impacts on aesthetic perception and psychosocial factors. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02718183. © 2018, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer International Publishing
dc.subjectAesthetic auto-perception
dc.subjectDark tooth bleaching
dc.subjectPsychosocial impact
dc.subjectRandomized clinical trial
dc.subjecthydrogen peroxide
dc.subjectperoxide
dc.subjecturea
dc.subjecttooth bleaching agent
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectclinical article
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectdental education
dc.subjectdental procedure
dc.subjectdouble blind procedure
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectOral Health Impact Profile
dc.subjectpractice guideline
dc.subjectpriority journal
dc.subjectPsychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics questionnaire
dc.subjectquality of life
dc.subjectquestionnaire
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trial
dc.subjectsocial psychology
dc.subjecttooth color
dc.subjecttooth root canal
dc.subjectdental procedure
dc.subjectprocedures
dc.subjectpsychology
dc.subjectquality of life
dc.subjecttooth discoloration
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectEsthetics, Dental
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectQuality of Life
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.subjectTooth Bleaching
dc.subjectTooth Bleaching Agents
dc.subjectTooth Discoloration
dc.titleQuality of life and stability of tooth color change at three months after dental bleaching
dc.typeArticle


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record