Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBersezio C.
dc.contributor.authorMartín J.
dc.contributor.authorHerrera A.
dc.contributor.authorLoguercio A.
dc.contributor.authorFernández E.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-02T22:13:09Z
dc.date.available2020-09-02T22:13:09Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier10.1186/s12903-018-0668-2
dc.identifier.citation18, 1, -
dc.identifier.issn14726831
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/3750
dc.descriptionBackground: The aesthetic self-perception and psychosocial impact of whitening is poorly explored in the literature; it is even less clear whether the effect of whitening may influence the psychology or social relations of patients. Therefore, the aim of this trial is to evaluate the impact of an at-home whitening procedure on patients' quality of life. Also, this study's secondary objective is the adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the OES questionnaire (OES-SP). Methods: Fifty eight patients underwent whitening with 10% carbamide peroxide (CP) gel for 1h daily for 3weeks. For these participants, the OHIP-Esthetics, PIDAQ, and OES surveys were applied before, one week after, and one month after the whitening procedure. Oral health-related quality of life was measured using the OHIP-Esthetics survey and the psychosocial impact using the PIDAQ survey. The orofacial aesthetics was measured by OES and validated for the Spanish Chilean context. The treatment efficacy (ΔE and ΔSGU) and data from the OHIP-Esthetics PIDAQ and OES surveys were compared using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test. Results: The whitening procedure was effective (ΔE=5.9±1.8). The OHIP-Esthetics results were significant when comparing the initial baseline survey prior to the treatment and one week after whitening (p<0.001) and when comparing the baseline and one-month results (p<0.001). The overall score on the PIDAQ, after one week post-whitening, was separated into factors and all factors were statistically significant (p<0.03); the factors for the one-month results were also all statistically significant (p<0.001), except the social impact factor. The OES questionnaire had statistically significantly increased scores both one week and one month post-treatment (p<0.0001). The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the OES-SP were satisfactory. Conclusion: The at-home whitening procedure with carbamide peroxide 10% had a positive effect on patients' oral health-related quality of life, psychology, and aesthetic perception after one month post-whitening. The Chilean Spanish version of the OES showed satisfactory psychometric characteristics to evaluate dental whitening. Trial registration:NCT02605239. Date that the study was retrospectively registered: 11-11-2015. © 2018 The Author(s).
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd.
dc.subjectOES
dc.subjectOHIP
dc.subjectPIDAQ
dc.subjectQuality of life
dc.subjectWhitening teeth
dc.subjecttooth bleaching agent
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectdental procedure
dc.subjectdrug therapy
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthealth
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmiddle aged
dc.subjectpsychology
dc.subjectquality of life
dc.subjectquestionnaire
dc.subjectself care
dc.subjectyoung adult
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectCarbamide Peroxide
dc.subjectEsthetics, Dental
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectOral Health
dc.subjectQuality of Life
dc.subjectSelf Care
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.subjectTooth Bleaching
dc.subjectTooth Bleaching Agents
dc.subjectYoung Adult
dc.titleThe effects of at-home whitening on patients' oral health, psychology, and aesthetic perception
dc.typeArticle


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record