Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarrios-Fernández S.
dc.contributor.authorPérez-Gómez J.
dc.contributor.authorGalán-Arroyo M.C.
dc.contributor.authorSeñorán-Rivera J.
dc.contributor.authorMartín-Carmona R.
dc.contributor.authorMendoza-Muñoz M.
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Gordillo M.Á.
dc.contributor.authorDomínguez-Muñoz F.J.
dc.contributor.authorAdsuar J.C.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-02T22:13:01Z
dc.date.available2020-09-02T22:13:01Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier10.3390/ijerph17041450
dc.identifier.citation17, 4, -
dc.identifier.issn16617827
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/3703
dc.descriptionBackground: Reliability refers to the precision of an assessment, so it is a critical topic to take the right decisions related to health management. People usually perform several tasks at the same time in their daily life. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability of the 30-s chair stand test in people with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) with test–retest, with and without dual-task (motor + cognitive task). Methods: Twenty-six subjects with T2DM and 30 subjects without T2DM performed the 30-s Chair Stand Test (30sCST) in which they must sit and stand as many times as possible in 30 s. They performed the test in the usual way (30sCST) and also with an additional cognitive task (30sCST-DT). A retest was conducted 7–14 days later. Results: Relative reliability was excellent in both groups (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9). In 30sCST-DT, relative reliability was high in the T2DM group (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.7) and excellent in subjects without T2DM (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9). Conclusions: The 30sCST and the 30sCST-DT tests are reliable tools for people with T2DM to measure changes after an intervention. The smallest real difference was 15% and 20% upper in the T2DM group in the 30sCST and 30sCST-DT tests, respectively. © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.subjectDual-task
dc.subjectIntraclass correlation coefficient
dc.subjectPhysical function
dc.subjectStandard error of measurement
dc.subjectcognition
dc.subjectcorrelation
dc.subjectdiabetes
dc.subjecthealth care
dc.subjecthealth services
dc.subjectpublic health
dc.subject30 second chair stand test
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectaged
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectclinical article
dc.subjectclinical evaluation
dc.subjectcognition
dc.subjectcognitive function test
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectdiabetes control
dc.subjectdiabetic neuropathy
dc.subjectdual-task performance (test)
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthealth program
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectnon insulin dependent diabetes mellitus
dc.subjectoutcome assessment
dc.subjectphysical performance
dc.subjectrisk assessment
dc.subjectrisk management
dc.subjecttest retest reliability
dc.titleReliability of 30-s chair stand test with and without cognitive task in people with type-2 diabetes mellitus
dc.typeArticle


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record