Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTopa, Gabriela
dc.contributor.authorAranda-Carmena, Mercedes
dc.contributor.authorDe-Maria, Berta
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-10T06:20:03Z
dc.date.available2024-04-10T06:20:03Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier10.3390/ijerph192315527
dc.identifier.issn16617827
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/10960
dc.description.abstractA psychological contract is a set of individual beliefs that a person has about the reciprocal obligations and benefits established in an exchange relationship, such as an employment relationship in an organizational setting. A psychological contract breach is a subjective experience referred to the perception of one of the parties that the other has failed to adequately fulfill its obligations and promises. Breaches have been systematically connected to employees’ attitudes and behaviors that hamper the employment relationship. Despite its apparent clarity, some relevant topics about psychological contract breach, psychological contract fulfillment and the relationships with their consequences still remain unclear. The main objective of this review of reviews is to conduct a review of reviews on psychological contract breaches, considering both systematic reviews and metanalytical papers with the purpose of synthesizing the evidence to date under the psychological contract theory. Using the SPIDER tool, our systematic review of reviews focuses on: (a) Sample; (b) Phenomenon of Interest; (c) Design; (d) Evaluation; and (e) Research type. Finally, only eight systematic reviews and meta-analyses met the inclusion criteria. Of the eight reviews included, seven were meta-analyses while the other was a systematic quantitative review. This study describes the available empirical research on psychological contract breaches and fulfillment and summarizes the meta-analytical evidence on their relationships with attitudinal and behavioral outcomes, as well as the role of potential moderator variables. Due to the methodological caveats of the reviews themselves and of the primary studies they were based on, our conclusions about the impact of psychological contract breaches on outcomes still remain tentative. © 2022 by the authors.es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.subjectpsychological contractes_ES
dc.subjectpsychological contract breaches_ES
dc.subjectreview of reviewses_ES
dc.subjectsystematic reviewes_ES
dc.titlePsychological Contract Breach and Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Reviewses_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record