Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMoya, Pedro Harris
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-10T02:05:14Z
dc.date.available2024-04-10T02:05:14Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier10.14409/redoeda.v10i1.12941
dc.identifier.issn2362583X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/10753
dc.description.abstractBased on the dogmatic method and the case law review, the purpose of this paper is to analyze the constitutional control of administrative appeals in Chile. In this context, this paper demonstrates that the absence of express provisions has not prevented the Constitutional Court from verifying the constitutionality of the laws that develop such challenge-related mechanisms. However, such control presents significant differences depending on whether it is exercised in a preventive or repressive manner. In the preventive variant, on the one hand, the examination of administrative appeals has been strictly formal, limited to verifying quorums for legislative approval. In the repressive variant, on the other hand, the review of these mechanisms has been extended due to the substantial nature of the criteria applied. © The Author(s), 2023.es_ES
dc.language.isoeses_ES
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional del Litorales_ES
dc.subjectadministrative appealses_ES
dc.subjectadministrative controles_ES
dc.subjectadministrative procedureses_ES
dc.subjectconstitutional controles_ES
dc.subjectdue processes_ES
dc.titleThe constitutional control of administrative appeals in Chilees_ES
dc.title.alternativeEl control constitucional de los recursos administrativos en Chilees_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record