Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorQuaresma, Maria Luísa
dc.contributor.authorVillalobos, Cristóbal
dc.contributor.authorFergnani, Mario
dc.contributor.authorDiaz, Bárbara
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-09T23:05:32Z
dc.date.available2024-04-09T23:05:32Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier10.17583/rise.7851
dc.identifier.issn20143575
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/10340
dc.description.abstractFew studies focus on understanding the role of universities in the elites’ legitimation processes. This article examines how elite universities-in the context of Chilean tertiary education massification-actively create privileged statuses. Focusing on eight case studies, we examine how these universities justify their roles and existence, generating distinctions that promote highly exclusive spaces, replicating elite privilege. Through 48 semi-structured interviews, this article focuses on understanding the justification arguments employed by faculty and deans from these elite institutions. Following Boltanski’s and Thévenot’s theoretical model, the results illustrate three different justification regimes: i) arguing for their elite status within the university system; ii) justifying the role they fulfil within Chilean society; and iii) defending their existence in the social structure. These regimes combine arguments relating to social justice, efficiency and market system performance in an eclectic and pragmatic way. © The Author(s) 2024.es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherHipatia Editoriales_ES
dc.subjectChilees_ES
dc.subjecteliteses_ES
dc.subjectHigher educationes_ES
dc.subjectjustification regimeses_ES
dc.titleI Justify Myself, Therefore I am. Regimes Of Justification In Chilean Elite Universitieses_ES
dc.title.alternativeMe Justifico, Luego Existo. Regímenes De Justificación En Las Universidades De Élite Chilenases_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record