Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorRuz Lártiga, Gonzalo
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-11T18:30:12Z
dc.date.available2020-11-11T18:30:12Z
dc.date.issued2019-07
dc.identifier.issn26596881
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/7176
dc.description.abstractThe paper proposes a reflection on the rule of equality of the creditors in order to verify what is myth or reality about it in the context of the current bankruptcy law. For this purpose, he undertakes a study of the origins of the rule in Rome in order to unravel the dogmatic context in which he was born, concluding that the rule par condicio creditorum was not established as a rule of equalization of credits, but rather as an assurance similar opportunities for creditors in the insolvent debtor’s contest, by eliminating the rule prior in tempore, potior in iure. Assuming the validity of this premise, the author argues that the rule is not a myth but a reality that, with specific exceptions for certain creditors and in certain collective proceedings, receives numerous recognitions in the bankruptcy law and in the judgments of the courts.es_ES
dc.language.isoeses_ES
dc.publisherCSIC Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificases_ES
dc.subjectBankruptcyes_ES
dc.subjectEquality of creditorses_ES
dc.subjectOrigines_ES
dc.subjectPar condicio creditorumes_ES
dc.subjectValidityes_ES
dc.titleThe par condicio creditorum rule: Myth or reality of bankrupcy? The historical origins of the rule and its expression in current bankrupcy lawes_ES
dc.title.alternativeLa regla par condicio creditorum: ¿Mito o realidad del derecho concursal? De los orígenes históricos de la regla y su expresión en el derecho concursal actuales_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem