Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorde Moraes P.H.
dc.contributor.authorOlate S.
dc.contributor.authorLauria A.
dc.contributor.authorde Moraes M.
dc.contributor.authorde Albergaria-Barbosa J.R.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-02T22:31:01Z
dc.date.available2020-09-02T22:31:01Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citation8, 10, 19282-19289
dc.identifier.issn19405901
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/6685
dc.descriptionThe aim of this research was to ascertain the survival of implants installed in the atrophic maxillae of patients treated with or without autogenous bone graft at 8 to 10 years of follow-up. A retrospective study was conducted using clinical and imaging analysis. 42 adult patients were selected, treated with osseointegrated implants in a fixed maxillary prosthesis model with suprastructure using 6 to 8 implants; of these, 22 underwent reconstruction with a bone graft taken from the anterior iliac crest and 20 were treated without any type of bone graft. The sequence of removal, installation and management of the grafts followed routine patterns, and the implant installation and prosthesis preparation also followed parameters established in previous publications. Variables of implant survival, stage of loss and bone stability of the implants were analyzed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, considering a value of P<0.05 to obtain statistical significance. After 8 to 10 years of follow-up the 306 implants installed in the 42 patients were evaluated. 162 implants were in the bone graft group, where 8.0% of implants were lost in the pre-loading stage, 3.7% in the post-loading stage and 88.7% had complete survival. In the group without bone graft, 6.17% were lost in the pre-loading stage, 1.85% in the post-loading stage and 90.97% had complete survival. There was no significant difference in the survival of the implants between the two groups (P=0.082). Cervical bone loss between the groups showed no significant differences either (P=0.241). The implants in grafted maxillae with cases of severe maxillary atrophy are just as efficient as implants installed in maxillae without bone graft. © 2015, E-Century Publishing Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherE-Century Publishing Corporation
dc.subjectAutogenous bone graft
dc.subjectImplant survival
dc.subjectMaxillary reconstruction
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectaged
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectautogenous bone graft reconstruction
dc.subjectautograft
dc.subjectbone atrophy
dc.subjectbone graft
dc.subjectbone regeneration
dc.subjectclinical article
dc.subjectdecortication
dc.subjectdiagnostic imaging
dc.subjectedentulousness
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectfollow up
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectiliac crest
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmaxilla
dc.subjectosteosynthesis
dc.subjectosteotomy
dc.subjectpanoramic radiography
dc.subjectretrospective study
dc.subjectsurvival rate
dc.subjecttitanium interference screw
dc.subjecttooth implant
dc.subjecttooth prosthesis
dc.subjectWilcoxon signed ranks test
dc.title8-10 year follow-up survival of dental implants in maxillae with or without autogenous bone graft reconstruction
dc.typeArticle


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem