Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorSenent-Aparicio J.
dc.contributor.authorAlcalá F.J.
dc.contributor.authorLiu S.
dc.contributor.authorJimeno-Sáez P.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-02T22:28:10Z
dc.date.available2020-09-02T22:28:10Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier10.3390/w12030657
dc.identifier.citation12, 3, -
dc.identifier.issn20734441
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/6229
dc.descriptionThis paper couples the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model and the chloride mass balance (CMB) method to improve the modeling of streamflow in high-permeability bedrock basins receiving interbasin groundwater flow (IGF). IGF refers to the naturally occurring groundwater flow beneath a topographic divide, which indicates that baseflow simulated by standard hydrological models may be substantially less than its actual magnitude. Identification and quantification of IGF is so difficult that most hydrological models use convenient simplifications to ignore it, leaving us with minimal knowledge of strategies to quantify it. The Castril River basin (CRB) was chosen to show this problematic and to propose the CMB method to assess the magnitude of the IGF contribution to baseflow. In this headwater area, which has null groundwater exploitation, the CMB method shows that yearly IGF hardly varies and represents about 51% of mean yearly baseflow. Based on this external IGF appraisal, simulated streamflow was corrected to obtain a reduction in the percent bias of the SWAT model, from 52.29 to 22.40. Corrected simulated streamflow was used during the SWAT model calibration and validation phases. The Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) coefficient and the logarithmic values of NSE (lnNSE) were used for overall SWAT model performance. For calibration and validation, monthly NSE was 0.77 and 0.80, respectively, whereas daily lnNSE was 0.81 and 0.64, respectively. This methodological framework, which includes initial system conceptualization and a new formulation, provides a reproducible way to deal with similar basins, the baseflow component of which is strongly determined by IGF. © 2020 by the authors.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.subjectBaseflow filter
dc.subjectCastril river
dc.subjectCMB method
dc.subjectInterbasin groundwater flow
dc.subjectSWAT model
dc.subjectChlorine compounds
dc.subjectGroundwater flow
dc.subjectHydrology
dc.subjectMechanical permeability
dc.subjectStream flow
dc.subjectBaseflows
dc.subjectCalibration and validations
dc.subjectCMB method
dc.subjectGroundwater exploitation
dc.subjectInterbasin groundwater flows
dc.subjectMethodological frameworks
dc.subjectSoil and water assessment tool
dc.subjectSWAT model
dc.subjectGroundwater
dc.subjectbaseflow
dc.subjectbedrock
dc.subjectcalibration
dc.subjectfilter
dc.subjectgroundwater flow
dc.subjecthydrological modeling
dc.subjectmethodology
dc.subjectmodel validation
dc.subjectpermeability
dc.subjectsoil and water assessment tool
dc.subjectstreamflow
dc.titleCoupling SWAT model and CMB method for modeling of high-permeability bedrock basins receiving interbasin groundwater flow
dc.typeArticle


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem