Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

The indetermination of the criminal compliance and the principle of legality [La indeterminación del criminal compliance y el principio de legalidad]

dc.contributor.authorScholz F.J.B.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-02T22:28:08Z
dc.date.available2020-09-02T22:28:08Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier10.4067/S0718-33992018000100208
dc.identifier.citation13, 25, 208-232
dc.identifier.issn07183399
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/6219
dc.descriptionThis paper is a critical analysis of the statutory regulation of criminal compliance models in criminal law. In the following pages, the author maintains that the model imposed in Act No. 20.393 has serious determination problems, which affect the principle of legality in its attribute of lex certa. The creation of an enforced self-regulation model with unclear or incomplete obligations, cannot justify the imposition of criminal sanctions in the case of their infraction. An analysis of other criminal compliance models in Chile and in other jurisdictions shows, that there are alternative regulatory techniques that preserve the legality principle. The author proposes the specification of the criminal compliance mandates through infra-legal provisions dictated by sectorial regulators, while respecting the constitutional requisites for incomplete penal statutes. © 2018 Centro Estudios Derecho Penal. All rights reserved.
dc.language.isoes
dc.publisherCentro Estudios Derecho Penal
dc.subjectCompliance
dc.subjectCorporate governance
dc.subjectLex certa
dc.subjectPrevention models
dc.subjectSelf-regulation
dc.titleThe indetermination of the criminal compliance and the principle of legality [La indeterminación del criminal compliance y el principio de legalidad]
dc.typeReview


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
item_2-s2.0-85049665434.pdf
Tamaño:
1.987Kb
Formato:
PDF
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem