La narración en las sentencias penales

San Juan C.A.; Tiznado J.P.Z.

dc.contributor.author	San Juan C.A.
dc.contributor.author	Tiznado J.P.Z.
dc.date.accessioned	2020-09-02T22:28:03Z
dc.date.available	2020-09-02T22:28:03Z
dc.date.issued	2009
dc.identifier.citation	24, 2, 28-41
dc.identifier.issn	0716498X
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/6176
dc.description	This work develops a proposed method for the analysis of penal sentences which allows them to be understood as a practice in discourse, and to be compared with other forms of social discourse. From a specialised corpus consisting of one hundred thirty-seven sentences handed down by Temuco Oral Tribunal in the penal area, and basing our work on van Dijk and the Grounded Theory methodology, we construct and structure to describe and model the internal organization of the decisions, facilitating the process of comparison and contrast with other discourses. The research helps to make it possible to study judicial discourse, highlighting the expectations of society which the judges consider legitimate and the practices of invisible violence which construct the idea of the delinquent as an enemy.
dc.language.iso	es
dc.publisher	Universidad de Talca
dc.subject	Criminal Sentences
dc.subject	Judicial Discourse
dc.subject	Story
dc.subject	Van Dijk
dc.title	La narración en las sentencias penales
dc.type	Article