Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
Bacteriophages in the control of pathogenic vibrios
dc.contributor.author | Plaza N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Castillo D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Pérez-Reytor D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Higuera G. | |
dc.contributor.author | García K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bastías R. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-02T22:25:52Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-09-02T22:25:52Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1016/j.ejbt.2017.10.012 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 31, , 24-33 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 07173458 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/5816 | |
dc.description | Vibrios are common inhabitants of marine and estuarine environments. Some of them can be pathogenic to humans and/or marine animals using a broad repertory of virulence factors. Lately, several reports have indicated that the incidence of Vibrio infections in humans is rising and also in animals constitute a continuing threat for aquaculture. Moreover, the continuous use of antibiotics has been accompanied by an emergence of antibiotic resistance in Vibrio species, implying a necessity for efficient treatments. One promising alternative that emerges is the use of lytic bacteriophages; however, there are some drawbacks that should be overcome to make phage therapy a widely accepted method. In this work, we discuss about the major pathogenic Vibrio species and the progress, benefits and disadvantages that have been detected during the experimental use of bacteriophages to their control. © 2017 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso | |
dc.subject | Antibiotic | |
dc.subject | Cholera | |
dc.subject | Gram-negative bacteria | |
dc.subject | Phage therapy | |
dc.subject | Vibrio | |
dc.subject | Vibrio anguillarum | |
dc.subject | Vibrio cholerae | |
dc.subject | Vibrio harveyi | |
dc.subject | Vibrio parahaemolyticus | |
dc.subject | Virulence | |
dc.subject | Animals | |
dc.subject | Antibiotics | |
dc.subject | Bacteria | |
dc.subject | Cholera | |
dc.subject | Gram-negative bacteria | |
dc.subject | Phage therapy | |
dc.subject | Vibrio | |
dc.subject | Vibrio anguillarum | |
dc.subject | Vibrio cholerae | |
dc.subject | Vibrio harveyi | |
dc.subject | Vibrio parahaemolyticus | |
dc.subject | Virulence | |
dc.subject | Bacteriophages | |
dc.subject | ampicillin | |
dc.subject | azithromycin | |
dc.subject | carbenicillin | |
dc.subject | cefalotin | |
dc.subject | chloramphenicol | |
dc.subject | ciprofloxacin | |
dc.subject | cotrimazine | |
dc.subject | erythromycin | |
dc.subject | hemolysin | |
dc.subject | kanamycin | |
dc.subject | penicillin G | |
dc.subject | polymyxin B | |
dc.subject | quinoline derived antiinfective agent | |
dc.subject | streptomycin | |
dc.subject | sulfamethoxazole | |
dc.subject | tetracycline | |
dc.subject | antibiotic resistance | |
dc.subject | bacterial strain | |
dc.subject | bacterial virulence | |
dc.subject | bacteriophage | |
dc.subject | bacterium isolate | |
dc.subject | cell motility | |
dc.subject | CRISPR Cas system | |
dc.subject | cytotoxicity | |
dc.subject | diarrhea | |
dc.subject | human | |
dc.subject | Listeria monocytogenes | |
dc.subject | nonhuman | |
dc.subject | Photobacterium damselae | |
dc.subject | protein expression | |
dc.subject | Review | |
dc.subject | Vibrio | |
dc.subject | Vibrio aestuarianus | |
dc.subject | Vibrio alginolyticus | |
dc.subject | Vibrio anguillarum | |
dc.subject | Vibrio campbellii | |
dc.subject | Vibrio cholerae | |
dc.subject | Vibrio cincinnatiensis | |
dc.subject | Vibrio fluvialis | |
dc.subject | Vibrio furnisii | |
dc.subject | Vibrio harveyi | |
dc.subject | Vibrio metschnikovii | |
dc.subject | Vibrio mimicus | |
dc.subject | Vibrio ordalli | |
dc.subject | Vibrio owensii | |
dc.subject | Vibrio parahaemolyticus | |
dc.subject | Vibrio splendidus | |
dc.subject | Vibrio vulnificus | |
dc.title | Bacteriophages in the control of pathogenic vibrios | |
dc.type | Review |