Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Helmet versus nasal-prong cpap in infants with acute bronchiolitis

dc.contributor.authorMayordomo-Colunga J.
dc.contributor.authorRey C.
dc.contributor.authorMedina A.
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Camblor P.
dc.contributor.authorVivanco-Allende A.
dc.contributor.authorConcha A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-02T22:22:52Z
dc.date.available2020-09-02T22:22:52Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier10.4187/respcare.05840
dc.identifier.citation63, 4, 455-463
dc.identifier.issn00201324
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/5278
dc.descriptionBACKGROUND: Nasal prongs are frequently used to deliver noninvasive CPAP in bronchiolitis, especially in the youngest children. A helmet interface is an alternative that might be comparable to nasal prongs. We sought to compare these interfaces. METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized, crossover, single-center study in an 8-bed multidisciplinary pediatric ICU in a university hospital. Infants age <3 months who were consecutively admitted to the pediatric ICU during a bronchiolitis epidemic season and fulfilled inclusion criteria were recruited. Subjects were randomly allocated to receive CPAP via a helmet or nasal prongs for 60 min. The subjects were then placed on the other CPAP system for another 60-min period (helmet then nasal prongs [H-NP] or nasal prongs then helmet [NP-H]). Measurements were taken at 30, 60, 90, and 120 min. Failure was defined as the need for further respiratory support. RESULTS: Sixteen subjects were included, with 9 in the H-NP group and 7 in the NP-H group. CPAP significantly reduced respiratory distress, showing no differences between the H-NP and NP-H groups in terms of improving the Modified Wood’s Clinical Asthma Score from 4.8-1 to 3-0.9 and 2.7-1.7 points at 60 min and 120 min in the H-NP group, respectively, and from 4.2-0.9 to 2.8-0.9 and to 2.9-0.9 at 60 min and 120 min, respectively, in the NP-H group. Sedatives were used in only 3 subjects (2 in the NP-H group, P = .77). The failure rate was similar in both groups (3 of 9 subjects vs 3 of 7 subjects, P = .70). No significant differences were seen for heart rate, breathing frequency, FIO2, or trans-cutaneous oxygen saturation response. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that CPAP delivered by nasal prongs and CPAP delivered by helmet are similar in terms of efficacy in young infants with acute bronchiolitis. Key words: bronchiolitis; continuous positive airway pressure; noninvasive ventilation; helmet; nasal prongs; infants. [Respir Care 2018;63(4):455–463. © 2018 Daedalus Enterprises]. © 2018, American Association for Respiratory Care. All rights reserved.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmerican Association for Respiratory Care
dc.titleHelmet versus nasal-prong cpap in infants with acute bronchiolitis
dc.typeArticle


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
item_2-s2.0-85054427866.pdf
Tamaño:
2.958Kb
Formato:
PDF
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem