Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorManterola C.
dc.contributor.authorOtzen T.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-02T22:22:17Z
dc.date.available2020-09-02T22:22:17Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier10.4067/S0717-95022014000200037
dc.identifier.citation32, 2, 599-607
dc.identifier.issn07179367
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/5171
dc.descriptionGiven the large number of publications, it is a problem to choose a study to respond to clinical problems with a good level of evidence. This requires following a scientific methodology, defining and limiting the problem, transforming it into a question, applying a search strategy in an appropriate source of information and finally, analyzing the information and summarizing the evidence found. Specific tools for analize the evidence had been develop. They are known as reading guides, Reader's Guides or Users' Guides, of which there are distinct formats, but in general, they give the necessary guidelines for the critical analysis of the different tipes of biomedical articles. These tools assess three key areas of study: internal validity, impact and external validity. The areas above mentioned are practically evaluated applying a user's guide to articles relating to treatment, as an example to a study published in a prestigious scientific journal.
dc.language.isoen
dc.language.isoes
dc.publisherUniversidad de la Frontera
dc.subjectCriticall appraisal of biomedical articles
dc.subjectEvidence-Based practice
dc.subjectReader's guides
dc.subjectUsers' guides
dc.titleCritical analysis of biomedical literature [Análisis crítico de la literatura biomédica]
dc.typeArticle


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem