Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorLatorre-Román P.Á.
dc.contributor.authorIzquierdo-Sánchez J.M.
dc.contributor.authorSalas-Sánchez J.
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Pinillos F.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-02T22:21:18Z
dc.date.available2020-09-02T22:21:18Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier10.3305/nh.2015.31.4.8479
dc.identifier.citation31, 4, 1717-1725
dc.identifier.issn02121611
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/5061
dc.descriptionAim: To analyze the body composition, strength level, and the quality of life related to the health (QoL) in veteran sportsmen (>35 years old) in relation to sedentary ones (S), and to compare the result in the mentioned variables between two models of sports practice, long-distance runners (LDR) and bodybuilding practitioners (BBP). Methods: One hundred forty-eight male participants took part and were distributed into three groups: 47 LDR (age=42.01±6.96 years), 49 BBP (age=45.14±7.04 years), and 47 S (age=43.71±8.75 years). Body composition, upper- and lower-limb strength level, and QoL were assessed. Results: The LDR and BBP obtained better performance in countermovement jump (CMJ) than the S ones (+0.06 m, p<0.001). Significant differences were found in BMI and %fat mass, between BBP and S with relation to LDR (p<0.001). In relation to the effect of aging on body composition, the muscle mass is reduced in all groups controlled (LDR, BBP, and S). Additionally, the %fat mass is increased only in S group (p< 0.05). The CMJ performance is significantly reduced only in S group (-0.07 m, p<0.001). Conclusions: The results suggested that the LDR as a model of active aging showed healthier values in BMI and %fat mass as well as greater results in QoL than BBP and S groups. Nevertheless, the LDR group showed similar values to S ones in muscle mass. The regression analysis performed showed that the sedentary habit predicts the %fat mass and CMJ performance. © 2015, Grupo Aula Medica S.A. All rights reserved.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGrupo Aula Medica S.A.
dc.subjectEndurance athletes
dc.subjectFitness
dc.subjectGym
dc.subjectHealth
dc.subjectResistance training
dc.subjectElagatis
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectaging
dc.subjectbody composition
dc.subjectbody mass
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectendurance
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmiddle aged
dc.subjectmuscle strength
dc.subjectphysiology
dc.subjectquality of life
dc.subjectrunning
dc.subjectsedentary lifestyle
dc.subjectweight lifting
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAging
dc.subjectBody Composition
dc.subjectBody Mass Index
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectMuscle Strength
dc.subjectPhysical Endurance
dc.subjectQuality of Life
dc.subjectRunning
dc.subjectSedentary Lifestyle
dc.subjectWeight Lifting
dc.titleComparative analysis between two models of active aging and its influence on body composition, strength levels and quality of life: Long-distance runners versus bodybuilders practitioners [Análisis comparativo entre dosmodelos de envejecimiento activo, y su influencia en la composición corporal, niveles de fuerza y calidad de vida: Atletas de resistencia y usuarios de musculación]
dc.typeArticle


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem