Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorLa Rosa D.
dc.contributor.authorSpyra M.
dc.contributor.authorInostroza L.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-02T22:21:10Z
dc.date.available2020-09-02T22:21:10Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.04.028
dc.identifier.citation61, , 74-89
dc.identifier.issn1470160X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/5020
dc.descriptionThe concept of Ecosystem Services has gained traction on the scientific agenda and has found its way into research on urban environments. Cities and towns, like any other ecosystem, provide specific services to their inhabitants and communities and they are benefited by surrounding ecosystems as well. Among the different categories, typical Ecosystem Services categories such as food production and erosion control usually have a lesser importance within urban contexts. However, the very diverse range of land uses and ecosystems in urban contexts provide specific Cultural Ecosystem Services including recreational, cultural and educational values. However, to date only limited attention has been given to the provision of Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES), especially considering the relevant benefits that communities and urban planning processes can derive from them. In this document we review existing approaches for the assessment of CES in urban contexts and provide a critical overview of how indicators are used to assess and measure CES. We first conduct a literature review on the indicators used for CES in urban contexts then the paper addresses some specific issues with reference to both operability and benefits of the use of CES indicators for urban planning and management. Our results show that existing CES indicators have limited usability for urban planning and management. Moreover a lack of appropriate data use is a significant obstacle for proper CES assessment. This impacts the potential for sustainable decision-making concerning CES in urban contexts. These issues, together with fact that most identified indicators are proxy ones, identify an urgent need to develop proper assessment indicators for CES. © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.subjectCultural Ecosystem Services
dc.subjectIndicators
dc.subjectUrban planning
dc.subjectDecision making
dc.subjectEcology
dc.subjectIndicators (instruments)
dc.subjectLand use
dc.subjectUrban planning
dc.subjectAssessment indicator
dc.subjectCities and towns
dc.subjectEcosystem services
dc.subjectLimited attentions
dc.subjectLiterature reviews
dc.subjectPlanning process
dc.subjectSustainable decision makings
dc.subjectUrban environments
dc.subjectEcosystems
dc.subjectcultural influence
dc.subjectdecision making
dc.subjectecosystem service
dc.subjectenvironmental assessment
dc.subjectenvironmental indicator
dc.subjectfood production
dc.subjectliterature review
dc.subjectresearch work
dc.subjectsustainable development
dc.subjecturban planning
dc.titleIndicators of Cultural Ecosystem Services for urban planning: A review
dc.typeReview


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem