Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorInostroza L.
dc.contributor.authorHamstead Z.
dc.contributor.authorSpyra M.
dc.contributor.authorQhreshi S.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-02T22:20:37Z
dc.date.available2020-09-02T22:20:37Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.09.028
dc.identifier.citation96, , 466-476
dc.identifier.issn1470160X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/4940
dc.descriptionUrbanisation is transforming landscapes across the world. As the urban matrix is extending across all landscape types, new spatial configurations have blurred the former contrast between urban and non-urban land uses. The spatial complexity of urbanisation challenges current landscape-scale assessments based on land cover methods and standard Boolean classifications of urban–rural. In this study, we quantify urbanisation as a continuous spatial process based on Technomass, a three-dimensional indicator that accounts for anthropogenic material stocks in the form of buildings and technical infrastructures. The aim is to perform a spatially explicit quantification of urbanisation degrees across the landscape by more accurately capturing the volumes of different types of anthropogenic stocks. The use of the technomass as an explicit indicator can more accurately describe the complex spatial structure of urbanisation. This allows a robust characterisation of urbanisation degrees at the landscape scale, useful for different ecological assessments. The research was conducted in the functional urban areas of Ostrava (Czech Republic) and Katowice (Poland), where cross-boundary asymmetric landscape configurations can be observed. This spatial characterisation of urbanisation can help to improve innovative and inter-disciplinary approaches used in landscape ecology, urban ecology, industrial ecology and spatial planning. © 2018 Elsevier Ltd
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.subjectCross-boundary landscapes
dc.subjectFunctional urban areas
dc.subjectGradient analysis
dc.subjectSpatial indicators
dc.subjectUrban coefficient
dc.subjectUrbanity
dc.subjectLand use
dc.subjectRural areas
dc.subjectUrban planning
dc.subjectCross-boundary landscapes
dc.subjectGradient analysis
dc.subjectSpatial indicators
dc.subjectUrban areas
dc.subjectUrban coefficient
dc.subjectUrbanity
dc.subjectEcology
dc.subjectanthropogenic effect
dc.subjectenvironmental assessment
dc.subjectindustrial ecology
dc.subjectinterdisciplinary approach
dc.subjectland cover
dc.subjectlandscape
dc.subjectlandscape ecology
dc.subjectrural-urban comparison
dc.subjectspatial analysis
dc.subjectspatial planning
dc.subjectsuburbanization
dc.subjecturban area
dc.subjecturbanization
dc.subjectCzech Republic
dc.subjectKatowice [Poland]
dc.subjectMoravskoslezsky
dc.subjectOstrava
dc.subjectPoland [Central Europe]
dc.titleBeyond urban–rural dichotomies: Measuring urbanisation degrees in central European landscapes using the technomass as an explicit indicator
dc.typeArticle


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem