Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez-Espinoza H.
dc.contributor.authorAraya-Quintanilla F.
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez-Monclus R.
dc.contributor.authorRíos-Riquelme M.
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez-Bueno C.
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Vizcaino V.
dc.contributor.authorCavero-Redondo I.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-02T22:19:59Z
dc.date.available2020-09-02T22:19:59Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier10.1016/j.msksp.2019.102052
dc.identifier.citation44, , -
dc.identifier.issn24688630
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/4837
dc.descriptionBackground: Adaptive shortening of the pectoralis minor is one of the biomechanical mechanisms associated with subacromial pain syndrome (SPS). Objective: To compare the effects of an exercise program alone with an exercise program in combination with pectoralis minor stretching in participants with SPS. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Methods: Eighty adult participants with SPS were randomly allocated to two groups. The control group (n = 40) received a 12-week specific exercise program and the intervention group (n = 40) received the same program plus stretching exercises of the pectoralis minor muscle. The primary outcome measure was shoulder function assessed by a Constant−Murley questionnaire, and the secondary outcomes were the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, visual analog scale (VAS), and pectoralis minor resting length. Results: The present study shows no difference between the two interventions according to the Constant−Murley questionnaire (1.5 points; p = 0.58), VAS at rest (0.2 cm; p = 0.11), VAS at movement (0.5 cm; p = 0.08), and pectoralis minor resting length (0.3 cm; p = 0.06). The DASH questionnaire showed greater functional improvement in the control group (5.4 points; p = 0.02). Finally, only pectoralis minor length index showed difference statistical significant in favor of intervention group (0.3%; p = 0.04). Conclusion: In the short-term, the addition of a program of stretching exercises of the pectoralis minor does not provide significant clinical benefit with respect to functional improvement or pain reduction in participants with SPS. Trial registration: Brazilian registry of clinical trials UTN number U1111-1210-3555. Registered 5 March 2018. © 2019 Elsevier Ltd
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.subjectExercise therapy
dc.subjectMuscle stretching exercises
dc.subjectRandomized clinical trial
dc.subjectSubacromial pain syndrome
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectanalgesia
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectclinical outcome
dc.subjectConstant Murley (score)
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectDisabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (score)
dc.subjectdisease duration
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectkinesiotherapy
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmiddle aged
dc.subjectmuscle length
dc.subjectmusculoskeletal function
dc.subjectoutcome assessment
dc.subjectparallel design
dc.subjectpectoral muscle
dc.subjectpriority journal
dc.subjectprogram effectiveness
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trial
dc.subjectshoulder
dc.subjectshoulder impingement syndrome
dc.subjectsingle blind procedure
dc.subjectstretching exercise
dc.subjectvisual analog scale
dc.subjectChile
dc.subjectdisability
dc.subjectkinesiotherapy
dc.subjectpain measurement
dc.subjectpathophysiology
dc.subjectshoulder pain
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectChile
dc.subjectDisability Evaluation
dc.subjectExercise Therapy
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectMuscle Stretching Exercises
dc.subjectPain Measurement
dc.subjectShoulder Pain
dc.subjectSingle-Blind Method
dc.titleDoes pectoralis minor stretching provide additional benefit over an exercise program in participants with subacromial pain syndrome? A randomized controlled trial
dc.typeArticle


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem