Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorGómez A.
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Expósito B.
dc.contributor.authorDurán E.
dc.contributor.authorMartín-Monzón I.
dc.contributor.authorBroglio C.
dc.contributor.authorSalas C.
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez F.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-02T22:19:52Z
dc.date.available2020-09-02T22:19:52Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.10.002
dc.identifier.citation167, , 332-340
dc.identifier.issn00319384
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/4784
dc.descriptionThe presence of multiple memory systems supported by different neural substrata has been demonstrated in animal and human studies. In mammals, two variants of eyeblink classical conditioning, differing only in the temporal relationships between the conditioned stimulus (CS) and the unconditioned stimulus (US), have been widely used to study the neural substrata of these different memory systems. Delay conditioning, in which both stimuli coincide in time, depends on a non-relational memory system supported by the cerebellum and associated brainstem circuits. In contrast, trace conditioning, in which a stimulus-free time gap separates the CS and the US, requires a declarative or relational memory system, thus depending on forebrain structures in addition to the cerebellum. The distinction between the explicit or relational and the implicit or procedural memory systems that support trace and delay classical conditioning has been extensively studied in mammals, but studies in other vertebrate groups are relatively scarce. In the present experiment we analyzed the differential involvement of the cerebellum and the telencephalon in delay and trace eyeblink-like classical conditioning in goldfish. The results show that whereas the cerebellum lesion prevented the eyeblink-like conditioning in both procedures, the telencephalon ablation impaired exclusively the acquisition of the trace conditioning. These data showing that comparable neural systems support delay and trace eyeblink conditioning in teleost fish and mammals suggest that these separate memory systems and their neural bases could be a shared ancestral brain feature of the vertebrate lineage. © 2016 Elsevier Inc.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.
dc.subjectCerebellum
dc.subjectDelay versus trace eyeblink classical conditioning
dc.subjectEpisodic-like memory
dc.subjectTelencephalon
dc.subjectTeleost fish
dc.subjectVertebrate brain evolution
dc.subjectanimal experiment
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectcerebellum
dc.subjectcerebellum injury
dc.subjectconditioned reflex
dc.subjectconditioning
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjecteyelid reflex
dc.subjectgoldfish
dc.subjecthabituation
dc.subjectlatent period
dc.subjectnonhuman
dc.subjectphotostimulation
dc.subjectpriority journal
dc.subjectprocedural memory
dc.subjecttelencephalon
dc.subjectadverse effects
dc.subjectanalysis of variance
dc.subjectanimal
dc.subjectauditory stimulation
dc.subjectblinking
dc.subjectbrain
dc.subjectbrain injury
dc.subjectgoldfish
dc.subjectmemory
dc.subjectpathophysiology
dc.subjectphysiology
dc.subjectreaction time
dc.subjecttime factor
dc.subjectAcoustic Stimulation
dc.subjectAnalysis of Variance
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectBlinking
dc.subjectBrain
dc.subjectBrain Injuries
dc.subjectConditioning, Classical
dc.subjectGoldfish
dc.subjectMemory
dc.subjectReaction Time
dc.subjectTime Factors
dc.titleRelational and procedural memory systems in the goldfish brain revealed by trace and delay eyeblink-like conditioning
dc.typeArticle


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem