Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
Chilean population norms derived from the health-related quality of Life SF-6D
dc.contributor.author | Garcia-Gordillo M.A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Collado-Mateo D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Olivares P.R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Adsuar J.C. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-02T22:18:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-09-02T22:18:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1007/s10198-017-0912-8 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 19, 5, 675-686 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 16187598 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/4596 | |
dc.description | Objectives: The Health-Related Quality of Life Short Form 6D (HRQoL SF-6D) provides utility values for health status. Utilities generated have a number of potentially valuable applications in economic evaluations and not only to ensure comparability between studies. Reference values can be useful to estimate the effect on patients’ HRQoL as a result of interventions in the absence of control groups. Thus, the purpose of this study was to provide normative values in the SF-6D in relation to the Chilean population. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted evaluating 5293 people. SF-6D utilities were derived from the SF-12 questions. Results: Mean SF-6D utility index for the whole sample was 0.74. It was better for men (0.78) than for women (0.71). The ceiling effect was much higher for men (11.16%) than for women (5.31%). Women were more likely to show problems in any dimension than were men. Conclusions: Chilean population norms for the SF-6D help in the decision-making process around health policies. Men reported higher health status than women in all subcategories analyzed. Likewise, men also reported higher scores than women in overall SF-6D dimensions. © 2017, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany. | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Springer Verlag | |
dc.subject | Health | |
dc.subject | HRQoL | |
dc.subject | Reference values | |
dc.subject | Utility | |
dc.subject | adolescent | |
dc.subject | adult | |
dc.subject | aged | |
dc.subject | Article | |
dc.subject | Chilean | |
dc.subject | clinical evaluation | |
dc.subject | cross-sectional study | |
dc.subject | decision making | |
dc.subject | divorce | |
dc.subject | economic evaluation | |
dc.subject | education | |
dc.subject | educational status | |
dc.subject | female | |
dc.subject | functional status assessment | |
dc.subject | groups by age | |
dc.subject | health care | |
dc.subject | health status | |
dc.subject | household income | |
dc.subject | human | |
dc.subject | major clinical study | |
dc.subject | male | |
dc.subject | marriage | |
dc.subject | married person | |
dc.subject | mental health | |
dc.subject | outcome assessment | |
dc.subject | priority journal | |
dc.subject | quality of life | |
dc.subject | reference value | |
dc.subject | rural area | |
dc.subject | separated person | |
dc.subject | sex difference | |
dc.subject | Short Form 6D | |
dc.subject | single (marital status) | |
dc.subject | smoking | |
dc.subject | social interaction | |
dc.subject | social norm | |
dc.subject | social status | |
dc.subject | urban area | |
dc.subject | very elderly | |
dc.subject | widowed person | |
dc.subject | cost benefit analysis | |
dc.subject | health status indicator | |
dc.subject | middle aged | |
dc.subject | questionnaire | |
dc.subject | young adult | |
dc.subject | Adolescent | |
dc.subject | Adult | |
dc.subject | Aged | |
dc.subject | Aged, 80 and over | |
dc.subject | Cost-Benefit Analysis | |
dc.subject | Cross-Sectional Studies | |
dc.subject | Female | |
dc.subject | Health Status | |
dc.subject | Health Status Indicators | |
dc.subject | Humans | |
dc.subject | Male | |
dc.subject | Middle Aged | |
dc.subject | Quality of Life | |
dc.subject | Surveys and Questionnaires | |
dc.subject | Young Adult | |
dc.title | Chilean population norms derived from the health-related quality of Life SF-6D | |
dc.type | Article |