Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
High condylectomy versus proportional condylectomy: Is secondary orthognathic surgery necessary?
dc.contributor.author | Fariña R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Olate S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Raposo A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Araya I. | |
dc.contributor.author | Alister J.P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Uribe F. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-02T22:17:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-09-02T22:17:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.07.016 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 45, 1, 72-77 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 09015027 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/4423 | |
dc.description | The objective of this study was to assess the need for secondary orthognathic surgery in patients undergoing two different condylectomy protocols for active unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH). A retrospective cohort study evaluated UCH patients treated by condylectomy. Two groups were established: group 1 comprised those who had undergone a high condylectomy (5 mm removed) and group 2 comprised those who had undergone a proportional condylectomy (removing the difference observed between the measurements of the hyperplastic and the healthy side). Data analysis was done with the Levene test and t-test; a P-value of <0.05 indicated a statistically significant relationship. Forty-nine patients, with an average age of 19.83 years, were analyzed; 11 were included in group 1 and 38 in group 2. There was no statistical difference between the two groups with regard to age or sex (P = 0.781). An average of 5.81 mm was removed in the high condylectomy group, while an average of 9.28 mm was removed in the proportional condylectomy group; this difference was statistically significant (P = 0.042). Comparing the two groups, proportional condylectomy reduced the need for secondary orthognathic surgery (P < 0.001). The proportional condylectomy can be used as the sole surgical treatment in cases of UCH, thus avoiding the need for secondary orthognathic surgery. © 2015 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Churchill Livingstone | |
dc.subject | condylar hyperplasia | |
dc.subject | condylectomy | |
dc.subject | facial asymmetry | |
dc.subject | hemimandibular elongation | |
dc.subject | hemimandibular hypertrophy | |
dc.subject | high condylectomy | |
dc.subject | low condylectomy | |
dc.subject | mandibular condyle | |
dc.subject | orthognathic surgery | |
dc.subject | proportional condylectomy | |
dc.subject | adult | |
dc.subject | Article | |
dc.subject | clinical article | |
dc.subject | cohort analysis | |
dc.subject | female | |
dc.subject | high condylectomy | |
dc.subject | human | |
dc.subject | hyperplasia | |
dc.subject | intermethod comparison | |
dc.subject | male | |
dc.subject | maxillofacial surgery | |
dc.subject | orthognathic surgery | |
dc.subject | osteotomy | |
dc.subject | proportional condylectomy | |
dc.subject | retrospective study | |
dc.subject | surgical technique | |
dc.subject | unilateral condylar hyperplasia | |
dc.subject | diagnostic imaging | |
dc.subject | face asymmetry | |
dc.subject | hyperplasia | |
dc.subject | mandible condyle | |
dc.subject | mandible osteotomy | |
dc.subject | orthodontics | |
dc.subject | pathology | |
dc.subject | physiotherapy | |
dc.subject | reoperation | |
dc.subject | sagittal split ramal osteotomy | |
dc.subject | surgery | |
dc.subject | treatment outcome | |
dc.subject | x-ray computed tomography | |
dc.subject | young adult | |
dc.subject | Facial Asymmetry | |
dc.subject | Female | |
dc.subject | Humans | |
dc.subject | Hyperplasia | |
dc.subject | Male | |
dc.subject | Mandibular Condyle | |
dc.subject | Mandibular Osteotomy | |
dc.subject | Orthodontics, Corrective | |
dc.subject | Orthognathic Surgical Procedures | |
dc.subject | Osteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus | |
dc.subject | Physical Therapy Modalities | |
dc.subject | Reoperation | |
dc.subject | Retrospective Studies | |
dc.subject | Tomography, X-Ray Computed | |
dc.subject | Treatment Outcome | |
dc.subject | Young Adult | |
dc.title | High condylectomy versus proportional condylectomy: Is secondary orthognathic surgery necessary? | |
dc.type | Article |