Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Using a dry electrode EEG device during balance tasks in healthy young-adult males: Test-retest reliability analysis

dc.contributor.authorCollado-Mateo D.
dc.contributor.authorAdsuar J.C.
dc.contributor.authorOlivares P.R.
dc.contributor.authorCano-Plasencia R.
dc.contributor.authorGusi N.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-02T22:14:56Z
dc.date.available2020-09-02T22:14:56Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier10.3109/08990220.2015.1074566
dc.identifier.citation32, 4, 219-226
dc.identifier.issn08990220
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/4046
dc.descriptionBackground: The analysis of brain activity during balance is an important topic in different fields of science. Given that all measurements involve an error that is caused by different agents, like the instrument, the researcher, or the natural human variability, a test-retest reliability evaluation of the electroencephalographic assessment is a needed starting point. However, there is a lack of information about the reliability of electroencephalographic measurements, especially in a new wireless device with dry electrodes.Objective: The current study aims to analyze the reliability of electroencephalographic measurements from a wireless device using dry electrodes during two different balance tests.Method: Seventeen healthy male volunteers performed two different static balance tasks on a Biodex Balance Platform: (a) with two feet on the platform and (b) with one foot on the platform. Electroencephalographic data was recorded using Enobio (Neuroelectrics). The mean power spectrum of the alpha band of the central and frontal channels was calculated. Relative and absolute indices of reliability were also calculated.Results: In general terms, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values of all the assessed channels can be classified as excellent (>0.90). The percentage standard error of measurement oscillated from 0.54% to 1.02% and the percentage smallest real difference ranged from 1.50% to 2.82%.Conclusion: Electroencephalographic assessment through an Enobio device during balance tasks has an excellent reliability. However, its utility was not demonstrated because responsiveness was not assessed. © 2015 Taylor & Francis.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Ltd
dc.subjectBalance
dc.subjectEEG
dc.subjectmotor control
dc.subjectpower spectrum
dc.subjectreliability
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectalpha rhythm
dc.subjectbody equilibrium
dc.subjectbrain cortex
dc.subjectelectrode
dc.subjectelectroencephalography
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectnormal human
dc.subjectphysiology
dc.subjectreproducibility
dc.subjectspectroscopy
dc.subjectwireless communication
dc.subjectyoung adult
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAlpha Rhythm
dc.subjectCerebral Cortex
dc.subjectElectrodes
dc.subjectElectroencephalography
dc.subjectHealthy Volunteers
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectPostural Balance
dc.subjectReproducibility of Results
dc.subjectSpectrum Analysis
dc.subjectWireless Technology
dc.subjectYoung Adult
dc.titleUsing a dry electrode EEG device during balance tasks in healthy young-adult males: Test-retest reliability analysis
dc.typeArticle


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
item_2-s2.0-84945461933.pdf
Tamaño:
3.349Kb
Formato:
PDF
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem