Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Methodological quality checklist for studies based on observational methodology (MQCOM) [Checklist de calidad metodológica para estudios basados en metodología observacional]

dc.contributor.authorChacón-Moscoso S.
dc.contributor.authorAnguera M.T.
dc.contributor.authorSanduvete-Chaves S.
dc.contributor.authorLosada J.L.
dc.contributor.authorLozano-Lozano J.A.
dc.contributor.authorPortell M.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-02T22:14:49Z
dc.date.available2020-09-02T22:14:49Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier10.7334/psicothema2019.116
dc.identifier.citation31, 4, 458-464
dc.identifier.issn02149915
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/3998
dc.descriptionBackground: No existing instrument addresses the minimum number of items that guarantee methodological quality in studies based on observational methodology. Consequently, professionals who are not experts in observational methodology do not have a basic framework to guide their practice in this type of study. This study developed a checklist to measure the minimum number of items for methodological quality that studies based on observational methodology should consider and provided evidence of their validity based on test content and intercoder reliability. Method: Fifty-four judges with at least 1 year of experience in observational methodology and research based on this methodology evaluated the items of the developed checklist in terms of relevance, usefulness, and feasibility. Items were selected if they obtained at least .5 in the Osterlind indexes of the three aspects evaluated. Two coders applied the selected items to a random selection of articles that used observational methodology to investigate soccer, and intercoder reliability was examined using Cohen’s kappa (κ) coefficients. Results: The fi nal checklist included 16 items grouped into 11 criteria/dimensions, with adequate reliability coeffi cients. Conclusions: This study developed a useful instrument for non-expert professionals to enhance the methodological quality of studies based on observational methodology. © 2019 Psicothema.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherColegio Oficial de Psicologos Asturias
dc.subjectChecklist
dc.subjectIntercoder reliability
dc.subjectMethodological quality
dc.subjectObservational methodology
dc.subjectValidity evidence based on test content
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectaged
dc.subjectchecklist
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmiddle aged
dc.subjectobservation
dc.subjectpractice guideline
dc.subjectprocedures
dc.subjectreproducibility
dc.subjectsoccer
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectChecklist
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectGuidelines as Topic
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectObservation
dc.subjectReproducibility of Results
dc.subjectSoccer
dc.titleMethodological quality checklist for studies based on observational methodology (MQCOM) [Checklist de calidad metodológica para estudios basados en metodología observacional]
dc.typeArticle


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
item_2-s2.0-85073656406.pdf
Tamaño:
2.864Kb
Formato:
PDF
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem