Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorCastillo M.A.J.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-02T22:14:18Z
dc.date.available2020-09-02T22:14:18Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citation32, 63, 103-123
dc.identifier.issn02541637
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/3950
dc.descriptionIn the last decades microfinance has been accounted as a revolutionary financial instrument for development. Nevertheless, outcomes in terms of poverty reduction have not been as extraordinary as was expected. Despite a huge academic progress registered in a large set of publications, we meet with relevant limitation in order to foresee and identify its determinants. This matter could be closely related to uncritical assimila tion of a minimalist approach as the systemic structure where academic progress has been conceived. This reductionist and aprioristic approach, far from shedding light on the foundations of microfinance, confines it into a symptomatic analysis extremely descriptive and conceptually sterile. With a critical exercise of four underlying categories we pretend to assert the impossibility of a minimalist approach as knowledgeable and operative structure for development. © 2017, Universidad Simon Bolivar. All rights reserved.
dc.language.isoes
dc.publisherUniversidad Simon Bolivar
dc.subjectEpistemology
dc.subjectFetishism
dc.subjectMicrofinance
dc.subjectMinimalism
dc.subjectPoverty
dc.titleMinimalism and microfinance: chronicle of an announced collapse [Minimalisme et microfinance: chronique d´un naufrage annoncé] [Minimalismo y microfinanzas: Crónica de un colapso anunciado]
dc.typeArticle


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem