Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorAravena P.C.
dc.contributor.authorDelgado F.
dc.contributor.authorOlave H.
dc.contributor.authorUlloa-Marin C.
dc.contributor.authorPerez-Rojas F.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-02T22:12:23Z
dc.date.available2020-09-02T22:12:23Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier10.2147/PPA.S106814
dc.identifier.citation10, , 1719-1725
dc.identifier.issn1177889X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/3584
dc.descriptionObjective: To describe the perception of the quality of life in oral health based on the Health-Related Quality of Life instrument in its Spanish version (HRQOL-sp) in Chilean patients with third molar extraction surgery. Patients and methods: A cross-sectional study. The HRQOL-sp was administered to dental patients at the Public Hospital in Rio Bueno in southern Chile treated for unilateral third molar extraction between March and June 2014. The instrument was applied by phone survey on the first, third, fifth, and seventh days after surgery. For the ordinal scale, the response was considered interference in the quality of life when patients selected the options “quite a bit of trouble” or “lots of trouble” for oral function and general activity; and selected complications-related signs and symptoms, a pain level score with a Verbal Rating Scale (range 0 to 7), and worst pain perceived. The patient’s sociodemographic data, type of surgery, and the quality of life level were analyzed according to the domains of the HRQOL-sp instrument. Results: A total of 106 patients were selected (age: 20.4±7.39 years; 71.7% women) and a total of 127 extracted third molars. On the first day of follow-up, most patients reported interference in their quality of life. The main problems were difficulty opening the mouth (50.94%) and swelling (83.02%). The worst symptom perceived was “bad breath” (>31%) and the worst pain felt was a mean of 4.31±1.62 on the Verbal Rating Scale. All items gradually reduced until the seventh day. Conclusion: The HRQOL-sp revealed substantial interference in the quality of life on the first postoperative day. It is suggested that the risk factors associated with quality of life be analyzed and the instrument in Spanish be validated. © 2016 Aravena et al.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherDove Medical Press Ltd.
dc.subjectComplications
dc.subjectDentistry
dc.subjectExtraction
dc.subjectOral surgery
dc.subjectQuality of life
dc.subjectThird molar
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectcheek swelling
dc.subjectChilean
dc.subjectcross-sectional study
dc.subjectdental surgery
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectfollow up
dc.subjecthalitosis
dc.subjectHealth Related Quality of Life Spanish version
dc.subjecthematoma
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmolar tooth
dc.subjectmouth disease
dc.subjectmouth hygiene
dc.subjectnausea
dc.subjectpain assessment
dc.subjectpatient attitude
dc.subjectpostoperative hemorrhage
dc.subjectquality of life
dc.subjectquality of life assessment
dc.subjectrisk factor
dc.subjectsymptom
dc.subjecttaste disorder
dc.subjectVerbal Rating Scale
dc.subjectyoung adult
dc.titleChilean patients’ perception of oral health-related quality of life after third molar surgery
dc.typeArticle


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem