Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
Real-world effectiveness and safety of erenumab for the treatment of migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.contributor.author | Fernández-Bravo-Rodrigo, Jaime | |
dc.contributor.author | Cavero-Redondo, Iván | |
dc.contributor.author | Lucerón-Lucas-Torres, Maribel | |
dc.contributor.author | Martínez-García, Irene | |
dc.contributor.author | Flor-García, Amparo | |
dc.contributor.author | Barreda-Hernández, Dolores | |
dc.contributor.author | Pascual-Morena, Carlos | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-19T04:43:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-06-19T04:43:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1016/j.ejphar.2024.176702 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 00142999 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/11333 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Migraine is a common and disabling primary headache disorder. Several drugs targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), such as erenumab (an anti-CGRP receptor mAb), have been developed recently. However, the real-world effects of erenumab are not well understood. Objective: To assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of erenumab for reducing migraine intensity and frequency in the real world. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library was conducted from inception to December 2023. Studies estimating the real-world effect of erenumab on monthly migraine days (MMD), monthly headache days (MHD), headache impact test (HIT-6), number of days in medication (NDM), acute monthly intake (AMI), pain intensity (PI) and safety outcomes were included. Meta-analyses of proportions or mean differences were performed. Results: Fifty-three studies were included. At 3-months, the effect was −7.18 days for MMD, −6.89 days for MHD, −6.97 for HIT-6, -6.22 days for NDM, −15.75 for AMI, and −1.71 for PI. Generally, the effect at 6- and 12-months increased slightly and gradually. The MMD/MHD response rates revealed that approximately one-third of patients exhibited a response greater than 30%, while one-sixth demonstrated a response exceeding 50%. Additionally, 3–4% of patients achieved a response rate of 100%. Adverse event rates were 0.34 and 0.43 at 6- and 12-months, respectively. Conclusion: This study provides strong evidence of the effectiveness and safety of erenumab in the real world; to our knowledge, this is the first real-world meta-analysis specific to erenumab. Erenumab represents a solid therapeutic option for physicians. © 2024 Elsevier B.V. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, UCLM, (2022-PROD-20657); Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, UCLM; Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, MCIU, (FPU21/06866); Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, MCIU | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | en | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Elsevier B.V. | es_ES |
dc.subject | Biological therapy | es_ES |
dc.subject | Meta-analysis | es_ES |
dc.subject | Migraine | es_ES |
dc.subject | Monoclonal antibody | es_ES |
dc.subject | Neurology | es_ES |
dc.subject | Systematic review | es_ES |
dc.title | Real-world effectiveness and safety of erenumab for the treatment of migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis | es_ES |
dc.type | Article | es_ES |