Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorFernández-Bravo-Rodrigo, Jaime
dc.contributor.authorCavero-Redondo, Iván
dc.contributor.authorLucerón-Lucas-Torres, Maribel
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-García, Irene
dc.contributor.authorFlor-García, Amparo
dc.contributor.authorBarreda-Hernández, Dolores
dc.contributor.authorPascual-Morena, Carlos
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-19T04:43:15Z
dc.date.available2024-06-19T04:43:15Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier10.1016/j.ejphar.2024.176702
dc.identifier.issn00142999
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/11333
dc.description.abstractBackground: Migraine is a common and disabling primary headache disorder. Several drugs targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), such as erenumab (an anti-CGRP receptor mAb), have been developed recently. However, the real-world effects of erenumab are not well understood. Objective: To assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of erenumab for reducing migraine intensity and frequency in the real world. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library was conducted from inception to December 2023. Studies estimating the real-world effect of erenumab on monthly migraine days (MMD), monthly headache days (MHD), headache impact test (HIT-6), number of days in medication (NDM), acute monthly intake (AMI), pain intensity (PI) and safety outcomes were included. Meta-analyses of proportions or mean differences were performed. Results: Fifty-three studies were included. At 3-months, the effect was −7.18 days for MMD, −6.89 days for MHD, −6.97 for HIT-6, -6.22 days for NDM, −15.75 for AMI, and −1.71 for PI. Generally, the effect at 6- and 12-months increased slightly and gradually. The MMD/MHD response rates revealed that approximately one-third of patients exhibited a response greater than 30%, while one-sixth demonstrated a response exceeding 50%. Additionally, 3–4% of patients achieved a response rate of 100%. Adverse event rates were 0.34 and 0.43 at 6- and 12-months, respectively. Conclusion: This study provides strong evidence of the effectiveness and safety of erenumab in the real world; to our knowledge, this is the first real-world meta-analysis specific to erenumab. Erenumab represents a solid therapeutic option for physicians. © 2024 Elsevier B.V.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversidad de Castilla-La Mancha, UCLM, (2022-PROD-20657); Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, UCLM; Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, MCIU, (FPU21/06866); Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, MCIUes_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.es_ES
dc.subjectBiological therapyes_ES
dc.subjectMeta-analysises_ES
dc.subjectMigrainees_ES
dc.subjectMonoclonal antibodyes_ES
dc.subjectNeurologyes_ES
dc.subjectSystematic reviewes_ES
dc.titleReal-world effectiveness and safety of erenumab for the treatment of migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysises_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem