Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Camblor, Pablo
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-10T06:44:54Z
dc.date.available2024-04-10T06:44:54Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier10.3390/ijerph191912476
dc.identifier.issn16617827
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/11077
dc.description.abstractProportional hazard Cox regression models are overwhelmingly used for analyzing time-dependent outcomes. Despite their associated hazard ratio is a valuable index for the difference between populations, its strong dependency on the underlying assumptions makes it a source of misinterpretation. Recently, a number of works have dealt with the subtleties and limitations of this interpretation. Besides, a number of alternative indices and different Cox-type models have been proposed. In this work, we use synthetic data, motivated by a real-world problem, for showing the strengths and weaknesses of some of those methods in the analysis of time-dependent outcomes. We use the power of synthetic data for considering observable results but also utopian designs. © 2022 by the author.es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.subjectCox regression modelses_ES
dc.subjecthazard ratioses_ES
dc.subjectmarginal Cox regression modelses_ES
dc.subjectsurvival analysises_ES
dc.subjecttime-to-eventes_ES
dc.titleLearning the Treatment Impact on Time-to-Event Outcomes: The Transcarotid Artery Revascularization Simulated Cohortes_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem