Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorHarris Moya, Pedro
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-10T06:30:37Z
dc.date.available2024-04-10T06:30:37Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier10.18601/01229893.n53.11
dc.identifier.issn01229893
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/10998
dc.description.abstractIn Chilean administrative law, sanitary sanctions have become the subject of a special contentious action (article 171 of the Sanitary Code), whose interpretation has been restrictive. The courts can only annul (and not modify) administrative sanctions. Given the fines, this cancellation would only apply if the imposition of the sanctions exceeds the legal maximum. As is easy to see, this replaces the principle of proportionality with the principle of legality, which is aggravated by the wide margin of appreciation in its imposition. Despite this, a rereading of the applicable regulations makes it possible to question these conclusions, in order to apply the principle of proportionality. © 2022 Universidad Externado de Colombia. All rights reserved.es_ES
dc.language.isoeses_ES
dc.publisherUniversidad Externado de Colombiaes_ES
dc.subjectfineses_ES
dc.subjectjudicial reviewes_ES
dc.subjectproportionalityes_ES
dc.subjectSanitary sanctionses_ES
dc.titleThe Administrative Litigation of Sanitary Fines in Chilean Law: Is it Compatible with the Principle of Proportionality?es_ES
dc.title.alternativeEl contencioso administrativo de multas sanitarias en el derecho chileno: ¿es compatible con el principio de proporcionalidad?**es_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem